I participated in The Future of Art, Archives and Special Collections a collaborative event organised by Tate's Library & Archive and Chelsea College of Art & Design.
"There is conflict blossoming at the heart of culture, a conflict convened around the property rights that subsist in materials stored in public archives"
This is a quote from Screen Tests
In the archive at Tate Britain, surrounded by relevant materials we had a series of presentations and really vibrant discussions around future access to art and art archives, futures embedded in the past, and more general issues of access and redistribution of knowledge.
Other contributors included:
Roshini Kempadoo - Reader in Media Practice, University of East London
Daniel McClean - lawyer and curator
Jo Melvin - Researcher and lecturer, CCW, Chelsea
Clive Phillpot - ex-Librarian at Chelsea and at MOMA, NYC
Professor David Garcia - Dean of Chelsea at CCW
Nana Ocran - editorial consultant, researcher and writer
Linda Sandino - Senior Research Fellow, CCW and V&A
Dr Maria Tamboukou - from the Centre for Narrative Research
Dr Dan Smith - Researcher and lecturer, Chelsea at CCW
Prof. Eileen Hogan
Jane Collins - Reader in Theatre Studies
Archives, like collections are built with the property of multiple authors and previous owners, although unlike the collection, an archive designates a territory - and not a particular narrative. There is no imperative, within the logic of the archive, to display or interpret. And therefore the meanings of the things contained are 'up-for-grabs'. It's a discursive terrain.
This is a quote from Archivalprocess